Be Specific About Books Conducive To Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
| Original Title: | Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung |
| ISBN: | 0415254086 (ISBN13: 9780415254083) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Paperback | Pages: 142 pages Rating: 4.07 | 15411 Users | 590 Reviews
Describe Appertaining To Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
| Title | : | Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus |
| Author | : | Ludwig Wittgenstein |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Deluxe Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 142 pages |
| Published | : | September 1st 2001 by Routledge Classics (first published 1921) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Nonfiction. Logic. Classics. Humanities. Language. Linguistics. European Literature. German Literature |
Commentary In Favor Of Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Perhaps the most important work of philosophy written in the twentieth century, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus was the only philosophical work that Ludwig Wittgenstein published during his life. Written in short, carefully numbered paragraphs of extreme brilliance, it captured the imagination of a generation of philosophers. For Wittgenstein, logic was something we use to conquer a reality which is in itself both elusive and unobtainable. He famously summarized the book in the following words: 'What can be said at all can be said clearly; and what we cannot talk about we must pass over in silence.' David Pears and Brian McGuinness received the highest praise for their meticulous translation. The work is prefaced by Bertrand Russell's original introduction to the first English edition.Rating Appertaining To Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Ratings: 4.07 From 15411 Users | 590 ReviewsPiece Appertaining To Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
An Unutterable History of Complete and Utter Stuff and Nonsense in Reverse"Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent."Wittgenstein, 1922"Thou canst not know what is not - that is impossible - nor utter it; for it is the same thing that can be thought and that can be."Parmenides, a long, long time ago (before 450 BC)If I may use a crude simile for illustration, Wittgenstein says that knowledge, or language, or science, is like a pile of cordwood. Each piece of wood is a proposition that mirrors or pictures a fact in the world. The pieces of wood are stacked on top of each other according to the logical rules for concatenating propositions, including implication (for causation) and universal quantifiers (for scientific principles). The pile of wood rests on a bottom layer of elementary propositions, of which
Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus is, alongside Heidegger's Being and Time and Wittgenstein's own posthumous Philosophical Investigation, one of the most important works of 20th Century philosophy. It is also one of the very few - the only? - "Great Books" or "Classics" in the analytical tradition. I would further maintain - and have always maintained - that it is among the most beautiful books ever written. Composed in the trenches of the First World War, the Tractatus is as much a
Revisiting this with formal logic and knowledge of Frege and Russell under my belt changed the experience tremendously. It reveals a work as strange and idiosyncratic in approach as it is insightful. For example universal generality, a very basic operator (i.e. -all- men are moral), is something Witt provides good reasons for being skeptical of, though the point presses more on what we assume when we use them rather than their use, and I feel you first have to take (∀x) for granted before
Patience is necessary if you're not within philosophy academia, like myself. It's not light reading but, conversely, Wittgenstein is not heavy material. In fact, it's the strict, disciplined simplicity of his ideas that adds some difficulty. The book ends on a fantastic note, either an affirmation or a haymaker to the field of philosophy. I'm still unsure which.
What the hell am I supposed to say about this?The parts I understood were hugely inspirational to my own thoughts, if I did indeed understand those parts, which I suspect I did not.What a shame that someone so clever who had decided that this book was the be-all and end-all to problems in philosophy could only communicate them in a form that often eludes human comprehension.It's like the saying that if the human brain were simple enough for us to understand it then we would be too stupid to do
The Tractatus is a mesmerizing pile of poo. I spent a semester trying to understand whatever it was that Wittgenstein seemed to have stumbled upon... it turns out that this is just nothing more than an engineer writing bad poetry. Crap. Absolute crap.."Whereof that which we cannot speak we must pass over in silence." What the devil is this? It's a coward's way out. Translation: "I can't roll with the big dogs so I'm going to take my ball and go home."If you want to read some philosophy, go
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.