Specify Books In Pursuance Of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
| Original Title: | The Structure of Scientific Revolutions |
| ISBN: | 0226458083 (ISBN13: 9780226458083) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Thomas S. Kuhn
Paperback | Pages: 226 pages Rating: 4.01 | 21447 Users | 1092 Reviews
Representaion As Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Thomas S. Kuhn's classic book is now available with a new index.
"A landmark in intellectual history which has attracted attention far beyond its own immediate field. . . . It is written with a combination of depth and clarity that make it an almost unbroken series of aphorisms. . . . Kuhn does not permit truth to be a criterion of scientific theories, he would presumably not claim his own theory to be true. But if causing a revolution is the hallmark of a superior paradigm, [this book] has been a resounding success." —Nicholas Wade, Science
"Perhaps the best explanation of [the] process of discovery." —William Erwin Thompson, New York Times Book Review
"Occasionally there emerges a book which has an influence far beyond its originally intended audience. . . . Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions . . . has clearly emerged as just such a work." —Ron Johnston, Times Higher Education Supplement
"Among the most influential academic books in this century." —Choice
One of "The Hundred Most Influential Books Since the Second World War," Times Literary Supplement
Define Regarding Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
| Title | : | The Structure of Scientific Revolutions |
| Author | : | Thomas S. Kuhn |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | 3rd |
| Pages | : | Pages: 226 pages |
| Published | : | 1996 by University of Chicago Press (first published 1962) |
| Categories | : | Science. Philosophy. Nonfiction. History. Sociology. History Of Science. Classics |
Rating Regarding Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Ratings: 4.01 From 21447 Users | 1092 ReviewsCommentary Regarding Books The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
The premise of the book is that science doesn't progress by the cumulative addition of knowledge, but instead advances by major shifts in paradigms that replace, rather than increment, large parts of previous paradigms. To begin with, scientific research in a specific subject is carried out within the bounds of a generally accepted framework that defines what scientists already know about the field, as well as the questions that remain unanswered. This is what Kuhn calls a paradigm. A paradigmI can understand why the author thanked his family for their consideration of the author's efforts towards this book, as it must have demanded a lot of painstaking effort not to mention time. I would have given it 3 stars for its complicated way of delivering its points; the language is highly complex that it tends at many certain points throughout, that the arguments contradict each other. Five stars, however for its complexity and taken as a whole it is actually coherent. Like the choice
Best review I have read. Thank you! I just finished reading Kuhn.
Scientists are so passionate about their work, and even if you're a scientist yourself it can sometimes take you by surprise to see just how passionate they are. A few years ago, when I was working at NASA, we made up a game called If Research Were Romance. Here, let me show you how to play.In real life, Thomas Kuhn wrote a book about paradigm changes in science. But if research were romance, he might have written a book about relationships instead. It might have been quite similar in many ways.
Scientists are so passionate about their work, and even if you're a scientist yourself it can sometimes take you by surprise to see just how passionate they are. A few years ago, when I was working at NASA, we made up a game called If Research Were Romance. Here, let me show you how to play.In real life, Thomas Kuhn wrote a book about paradigm changes in science. But if research were romance, he might have written a book about relationships instead. It might have been quite similar in many ways.
Remember your 10th grade Geometry class? It was a 55 minute class just before lunch. Picture yourself, 15 years old, Friday, ensconced in Geometry on a beautiful late September day. If youre a girl, youre much more interested in whether the new boy is going to sit with Amber during lunch for a third day in a row, and what hes going to say to her this time; hes so confident and handsome. If youre a guy, youre much more interested in the 17 year old Varsity cheerleader at the front of your class,
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.